Business Ethics

Case Solution for Shell E&P Ireland Limited (SEPIL) and the Corrib Gas Controversy

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Shell E&P Ireland Limited (SEPIL) and the Corrib Gas Controversy
Authors :           James Kennelly, Trevor Mengel
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0198
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    26 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
This case narrates a complex, long-running, and emotional controversy between Shell Exploration & Production Ireland (SEPIL) and opponents of its planned natural gas pipeline and gas processing facility in County Mayo, Ireland. The Corrib Gas Project is years behind schedule and over budget. SEPIL must not only complete the project, but must do so in a manner consistent with its own principles of corporate social responsibility. This case provides an opportunity to explore the challenges implicit in utilizing stakeholder management approaches. Students must evaluate various options available to SEPIL such as: Should the gas be processed at sea, as the more strident protestors demand? Should the processing facility be relocated to an area of no habitation, as other protestors wish, which would mean writing off a significant investment? For that matter, is this project worth completing at any cost? Finally, despite having all the required statutory approvals, final implementation would probably require utilizing the Garda Siochána (the Irish national police force) and other resources of the Irish State, as well as Shell’s own contract security force, to keep protestors at bay. But what are the possible effects of such action on Shell’s corporate reputation, and what if something, anything, goes wrong? It is not only which course of action SEPIL chooses to undertake, but how the action is implemented, that matters. This case is most appropriate for use in MBA and upper-level undergraduate courses in Business Ethics, Business and Society, International Business, and Business and the Natural Environment.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.: End of Incentives

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.: End of Incentives
Authors :           Tara Ceranic, Ivan Montiel, Wendy S Cook
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0156
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    12 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Ken Grossman walked into Bill Bales’ office hoping to find an answer. Grossman, the owner of Sierra Nevada Brewing Company was considering the new reality that he was facing, and he brought the dilemma to Bales, his CFO. Grossman had made a commitment to environmental sustainability, the overriding cultural norm of his organization. Initially, the decision to install the five-phase solar array was made expecting California to provide tax incentives that would save the company a substantial amount of money on the installation. Grossman had received word that the company had run up against the “cap” for the State of California, which meant that they would no longer receive any subsidies for green power installments. With one phase of the installation yet to go, the question of possibly putting the money elsewhere kept nagging at Ken. Previous incentives meant the return on their environmental investments had always been fairly rapid, which enabled the company to continue aggressively pursuing their dedication to preserving the natural environment. Now, however, what to do? Finishing the solar array would be costly. Time to payback more than doubled from seven years to fifteen without the incentives from California State. As it stood, the brewery was light years ahead of industry standards and had completed the installation of the majority of the array.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Striking at the Queen

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Striking at the Queen
Authors :           Carolyn Conn, Aundrea K. Guess
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0158
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    20 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
The focus of this case is a series of ethical dilemmas faced by three undergraduate students, in their pursuit of solutions to perceived mismanagement, financial misdeeds, and possible fraud by their university’s administrators. After Calvin Collins, Kent Russell, and Daniel Morris (who became known as the Tech-3) accidentally found confidential university payroll records discarded in a non-secure area, they took the records and their concerns to several administrators. Because they were rebuffed by university officials, the students “went public” to the news media and on to the state capitol. After their public cry for the resignation of the university president, the three students were put on probation and two of the three were arrested on criminal charges. University administrators attempted to break up the solidarity of the three students. After several months of “fighting the good fight,” several enticements were offered to Collins by a university trustee. Collins must decide whether to accept the enticements and persuade his friends they should give up their fight to improve conditions at the university. If they continue to demand change, they would be going against extremely challenging obstacles. The administration make it impossible for them to complete their degrees. Continuing their battle will involve much personal sacrifice. Was it time for the students to give up? Had they already gone too far?

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for The Midnight Journal Entry

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      The Midnight Journal Entry
Authors :           Anne T. Lawrence
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0180
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    10 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
How should a chief financial officer respond when he uncovers a serious accounting fraud? Richard Okumoto, the newly-appointed CFO of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., learned that around midnight several months earlier, a group of managers, led by a man who later became CEO, had reversed an accrued liability associated with the anticipated cost of employee retirement benefits. This “midnight journal entry” had allowed the company to report a gain, rather than a loss, for the quarter. Okumoto believed that the reversal was improper and the company’s earnings should be restated. When he approached the CEO, the general counsel, and the audit committee with his concerns, however, he was told to “just get past it.” Okumoto had to decide how best to act on his conviction that the company had committed an unethical and illegal act, while minimizing the risk to himself and his future career prospects.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solutions for Don’t Just Dump It!: Saving Sandy Pond

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Don’t Just Dump It!: Saving Sandy Pond
Authors :           Robert W. Sexty, Natalie Slawinski, Kristen C Baker
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0223
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    19 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In July 2009, Vale NL began building a $2.17 billion nickel refinery in Long Harbour, Newfoundland and Labrador. The refinery would bring economic prosperity by creating 1,600 to 2,000 jobs during construction and 400 to 500 permanent jobs in an area of high unemployment. The project’s environmental assessment process began 2006 and the company had successfully completed the required environmental impact statements for the government. A major environmental issue was the disposal of tailings from the refinery, and the approved solution was to store them in a natural lake known as Sandy Pond. Members of several environmental NGOs had opposed the use of the lake as a “tailings impoundment area” and formed the Sandy Pond Alliance for the Protection of Canadian Waters (SPA). The use of natural lakes was allowed, but SPA believed that the regulation that permitted the use was inconsistent with environmental legislation. SPA had to decide how to challenge the use of tailings ponds at Long Harbour and elsewhere in Canada, and whom to target in its efforts. Instead of being designed as a management decision-making exercise, this case places students in the position of environmentalists as they decide what course of action to initiate.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Centurion Media: Doing the Right Thing

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Centurion Media: Doing the Right Thing
Authors :           Carolyn Conn, Aundrea K. Guess, Jonathan Hiatt
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0005
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    12 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Richard Bennett was faced with a serious ethical dilemma that would impact his career, family, and co-workers. Bennett, a regional vice president in the Cable Division of Centurion Media, believed that a contract executed by the new president of his division, Joseph Fowler, would cause significant financial losses for Bennett’s own division and the company. Bennett suspected that Fowler might have a serious conflict of interest, since he owned stock and options in Northpark-the company with which he had negotiated the contract. Bennett was only two years from retirement. If he chose to protest the contract, it would likely have very unpleasant consequences — including jeopardizing his own financial security. He would probably be fired. Additionally, his actions might endanger the careers of other employees and co-workers. The personal relationship between the CEO of Centurion Media, Chuck Reilly, and Fowler made Bennett’s decision more difficult. When Bennett contacted the general counsel and controller in the corporate office of Centurion Media, they suggested he back off. He was surprised by their stance that the contract, which Bennett thought would be financially disastrous, was in the best interest of the company. The Controller went so far as to remind Bennett how near he was to retirement, emphasizing that he should be concerned about protecting his job. What should Bennett do about the situation he faced?

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub