Business Ethics

Case Solution for Who Is This Guy?

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Who Is This Guy?
Authors :           Dalton E. Brannen, Simon K. Medcalfe, Roland B. Cousins
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0337
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    06 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
As chair of the accounting department at Southern Regional University (SRU), Professor David Evans recently hired a seemingly promising young assistant professor of accounting. Evans has now received some very disturbing information regarding this faculty member. The information was that this new hire does not possess the academic nor professional credentials he claimed. As a result, Evans was in a near panic as to what action he should recommend. He contemplated his options, which were: denounce this fraud and fire him immediately; quietly terminate him and make a vague announcement about his unexpected departure; or allow this individual to finish the term and not renew his contract. Evans weighed the reaction of the university community, the public, and the results for himself. In case B in the Instructor’s Manual the recommendation Evans made to the academic vice president was accepted and acted upon. This decision in turn had second order consequences for organizations outside of SRU. In case C there were third order consequences of a serious and personal nature for another member of the accounting department.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Too Much Information

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Too Much Information
Authors :           Anna Hawkins, John Melnyk
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W14378
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    03 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
A university student is working on a group project for a case-based business ethics course. Just over a week before the project deadline, one of her fellow group members reveals that he has found part (B) of the assigned case on the Internet. He has read this document, which specifies exactly what the company has done to address the challenge in the case they are working on. It is clear to the protagonist that her group cannot use this information, but she is unsure of how to handle the situation.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Starbright Jewelers

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Starbright Jewelers
Authors :           Karen E. Boroff, Samantha Lordi
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0321
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    07 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Roger Cosgrove had to make a decision on what to do with his employee, Jennifer Johnson, whom he learned had allegedly stolen $120,000 from his former business associate, Michael Libretti. He was conflicted by the ethical dilemmas this issue raised. In April 2011, Cosgrove had a chance meeting with Libretti at Libretti’s place of business, Starbright Jewelers. Cosgrove and Libretti once operated Starbright in a joint operation but, because of changing economic conditions, dissolved their joint operation amicably in 2008. Johnson, who had worked for both men at Starbright, elected, at Cosgrove’s request, to follow him to his new business venture, Silver Shine. She continued to work part time on Saturdays for Libretti at Starbright, to supplement her income. Cosgrove and Libretti had remained friends, and occasionally met to catch up on news. It was at one of these get-togethers that Cosgrove heard from Libretti the accusation of theft. Johnson had left her part-time job at Starbright in 2010 on her own accord. When Libretti subsequently hired a replacement for Johnson, he discovered through the replacement’s efforts that Johnson stole about $120,000 from him from 2004 through 2010. After Libretti shared with Cosgrove this story, he asked Cosgrove what he, Cosgrove, was going to do, in Libretti’s words, “with the thief who is working for you now.” Cosgrove had to balance the competing needs of the many persons who had an interest in his decision. He wanted to protect his business, his reputation, and his customers from exposure to a potential thief. He wanted to protect his family’s well-being and also to be supportive to his business associate, Libretti. Even so, he felt that taking action on Johnson was assuming she was guilty already, without benefit of any investigation. He sought advice from several sources, and was frustrated that there was no clear direction to follow.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Hewlett-Packard and a Common Supplier Code of Conduct

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Hewlett-Packard and a Common Supplier Code of Conduct
Authors :           Anne T. Lawrence
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0019
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    07 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Should Hewlett-Packard cooperate with other firms in the electronics industry to develop a common code of conduct for suppliers? HP, a leading provider of personal computing, imaging, and printing products, had developed a comprehensive set of labor, environmental, and human rights standards for its suppliers. However, the company remained concerned about its reputational vulnerability and lack of supplier compliance. Ken Larson, HP’s Manager of Corporate Social Responsibility, considered whether the company could best advance its interests through industry collaboration on a common code of conduct.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Unauthorized Disclosure: Hewlett-Packard’s Secret Surveillance of Directors and Journalists

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Unauthorized Disclosure: Hewlett-Packard’s Secret Surveillance of Directors and Journalists
Authors :           Anne T. Lawrence, Randall D. Harris, Sally Baack
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0050
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    16 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In 2006, Hewlett-Packard (HP) admitted it had hired outside investigators to spy on members of its board of directors and journalists to uncover the source of several leaks of confidential board deliberations. The investigators used methods, including “pretexting” (using an assumed identity in order to access others’ telephone records), which were possibly illegal and almost certainly unethical. This case uses company e-mails, internal reports, meeting minutes, and published memoirs and interviews to present various perspectives on HP’s leak investigations, including those of its non-executive chairman, CEO, former CEO, board members, managers, and investigators. What problem was HP attempting to address? Did the board’s behavior conform to accepted standards of good corporate governance? Were the investigation’s methods ethical? What, if anything, should the company and its chairman, Patricia Dunn, have done differently? How could HP’s new CEO, Mark Hurd, best assure effective governance and ethical behavior in the future?

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Responding to a Heated Classroom Discussion: Affirmative Action Example

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Responding to a Heated Classroom Discussion: Affirmative Action Example
Authors :           Deborah R. Ettington
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0017
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    08 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Professor Jeffrey Moran needed to decide how to respond to the aftermath from the previous day’s heated discussion of affirmative action in his Social Responsibility and Business Ethics class. He felt the emotions that erupted provided a “teachable moment” and that the class ended well. However, one African-American student later complained via e-mail that she felt disrespected in the discussion and did not feel that the topic was adequately portrayed. Dissatisfied with waiting for his response to her e-mail, the student called the department chair to complain. The department chair expects Moran to handle the situation.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Disability Accommodations and Promotions at Bunco

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Disability Accommodations and Promotions at Bunco
Authors :           Katherine E Breward
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0074
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    07 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
This case highlights the dilemma of Nicholas, an accounting executive, who must decide whether to promote a disabled employee, Paul, to a management role. Paul is a strong performer; however he is frequently required to work at home on a laptop in order to manage the symptoms of Crohn’s disease. Nicholas needs to decide whether this presents a barrier to Paul’s ability to take on greater degrees of responsibility. He struggles with the legal and ethical implications of his decision. The impact of his decision on the rest of his team is also considered.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Shell E&P Ireland Limited (SEPIL) and the Corrib Gas Controversy

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Shell E&P Ireland Limited (SEPIL) and the Corrib Gas Controversy
Authors :           James Kennelly, Trevor Mengel
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0198
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    26 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
This case narrates a complex, long-running, and emotional controversy between Shell Exploration & Production Ireland (SEPIL) and opponents of its planned natural gas pipeline and gas processing facility in County Mayo, Ireland. The Corrib Gas Project is years behind schedule and over budget. SEPIL must not only complete the project, but must do so in a manner consistent with its own principles of corporate social responsibility. This case provides an opportunity to explore the challenges implicit in utilizing stakeholder management approaches. Students must evaluate various options available to SEPIL such as: Should the gas be processed at sea, as the more strident protestors demand? Should the processing facility be relocated to an area of no habitation, as other protestors wish, which would mean writing off a significant investment? For that matter, is this project worth completing at any cost? Finally, despite having all the required statutory approvals, final implementation would probably require utilizing the Garda Siochána (the Irish national police force) and other resources of the Irish State, as well as Shell’s own contract security force, to keep protestors at bay. But what are the possible effects of such action on Shell’s corporate reputation, and what if something, anything, goes wrong? It is not only which course of action SEPIL chooses to undertake, but how the action is implemented, that matters. This case is most appropriate for use in MBA and upper-level undergraduate courses in Business Ethics, Business and Society, International Business, and Business and the Natural Environment.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.: End of Incentives

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.: End of Incentives
Authors :           Tara Ceranic, Ivan Montiel, Wendy S Cook
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0156
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    12 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Ken Grossman walked into Bill Bales’ office hoping to find an answer. Grossman, the owner of Sierra Nevada Brewing Company was considering the new reality that he was facing, and he brought the dilemma to Bales, his CFO. Grossman had made a commitment to environmental sustainability, the overriding cultural norm of his organization. Initially, the decision to install the five-phase solar array was made expecting California to provide tax incentives that would save the company a substantial amount of money on the installation. Grossman had received word that the company had run up against the “cap” for the State of California, which meant that they would no longer receive any subsidies for green power installments. With one phase of the installation yet to go, the question of possibly putting the money elsewhere kept nagging at Ken. Previous incentives meant the return on their environmental investments had always been fairly rapid, which enabled the company to continue aggressively pursuing their dedication to preserving the natural environment. Now, however, what to do? Finishing the solar array would be costly. Time to payback more than doubled from seven years to fifteen without the incentives from California State. As it stood, the brewery was light years ahead of industry standards and had completed the installation of the majority of the array.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Striking at the Queen

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Striking at the Queen
Authors :           Carolyn Conn, Aundrea K. Guess
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0158
Discipline :        Business Ethics
Case Length :    20 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
The focus of this case is a series of ethical dilemmas faced by three undergraduate students, in their pursuit of solutions to perceived mismanagement, financial misdeeds, and possible fraud by their university’s administrators. After Calvin Collins, Kent Russell, and Daniel Morris (who became known as the Tech-3) accidentally found confidential university payroll records discarded in a non-secure area, they took the records and their concerns to several administrators. Because they were rebuffed by university officials, the students “went public” to the news media and on to the state capitol. After their public cry for the resignation of the university president, the three students were put on probation and two of the three were arrested on criminal charges. University administrators attempted to break up the solidarity of the three students. After several months of “fighting the good fight,” several enticements were offered to Collins by a university trustee. Collins must decide whether to accept the enticements and persuade his friends they should give up their fight to improve conditions at the university. If they continue to demand change, they would be going against extremely challenging obstacles. The administration make it impossible for them to complete their degrees. Continuing their battle will involve much personal sacrifice. Was it time for the students to give up? Had they already gone too far?

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub