Author: casesolutionshub

Case Solution for GMR Airport Concession: Mumbai Versus Delhi

Case Solution & Analysis for GMR Airport Concession: Mumbai Versus Delhi by Abhilash Nair, Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      GMR Airport Concession: Mumbai Versus Delhi
Authors :           Abhilash Nair, Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N014 / W16306
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    15 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In 2004, bids were invited from airport developers and operators for the development and operation of Mumbai’s Chattrapati Shivaji International Airport and Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport. On January 31, 2006, a consortium led by GMR Group (GMR) was selected as the only technically qualified bidder. However, in order to avoid a monopoly in Indian airport operations, GMR was asked to choose between the two airports and match the financial bid of another bidder that was not technically qualified for the work. The Delhi airport, the pride of the National Capital Region, would serve as a gateway for participants, dignitaries, and other guests arriving for the upcoming Commonwealth Games to be held in New Delhi in October 2010. However, the Mumbai airport was the gateway to business investments in India. GMR faced a difficult choice between a mission-critical airport in the National Capital Region or an airport in India’s commercial capital. Which airport would give GMR an edge in the global aviation sector? Which choice was in line with GMR’s vision?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Toyota’s Innovative Share Issue (2015)

Case Solution & Analysis for Toyota’s Innovative Share Issue (2015) by Emir Hrnjic.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Toyota’s Innovative Share Issue (2015)
Authors :           Emir Hrnjic
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N008 / W16373
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    13 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In June 2015, the Toyota Motor Corporation’s annual shareholders’ meeting included a proposal regarding Toyota’s new share issue. Named “Model AA” shares after the company’s first passenger car, the shares would offer investors new hybrid securities. This proposal created a lot of controversy among existing shareholders. Although President Toyoda claimed that no one would be disadvantaged by these shares, it remained unclear how many shareholders had confidence in this assurance. The share issue, which would potentially comprise up to 5 per cent of Toyota’s total outstanding shares, would require the support of a two-thirds majority of shareholders. The new shares looked like ordinary shares with a “lock-up” period or preferred shares with voting rights. At the same time, Model AA shares resembled a convertible debt issue with voting rights (with a conversion ratio to be determined later). It was time to vote on the approval of Toyota’s new share issue, but the following questions lingered in the shareholders’ minds: What exactly was the difference between Model AA shares and ordinary shares? What was the difference between Model AA shares and bonds (or convertible bonds)? Finally, if the vote was approved, how should Model AA shares be priced?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for The Pipeline Company: Financing for China’s MNGPP

Case Solution & Analysis for The Pipeline Company: Financing for China’s MNGPP by Xiuqin Wang, Ming Jian.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      The Pipeline Company: Financing for China’s MNGPP
Authors :           Xiuqin Wang, Ming Jian
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N019 / W16449
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    09 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In 2008, the Multinational Natural Gas Pipeline Project was sponsored by China National Group Corporation to undertake a major international infrastructure project in Asia. The Pipeline Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of China National Group Corporation, established joint ventures with the host countries and took the lead in financing the project, which was required to be completed by the end of 2009. Initial investments and procurements were made, and payment would soon be due. However, there was a large gap between the estimated total investment and the funds available. Numerous banks expressed interest in the pipeline project, but most required the sponsor to provide a guarantee for the project’s loan. Some banks also asked for an increase in the capital ratio from less than 1 per cent to 20 per cent. The treasurer responsible for the financing of the project was now tasked with the issue of arranging the most effective way to finance the project.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Fraud at Bank of Baroda: Manage Risk or Manage Crisis

Case Solution & Analysis for Fraud at Bank of Baroda: Manage Risk or Manage Crisis by Sanjay Dhamija.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Fraud at Bank of Baroda: Manage Risk or Manage Crisis
Authors :           Sanjay Dhamija
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N021 / W16476
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    09 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Bank of Baroda was the second-largest commercial bank in India, but it was struggling with a decline in profits and an increase in non-performing assets. Only a week before the new chief executive officer’s term commenced, Bank of Baroda was in the news due to reports of fraud occurring at the bank’s Ahmedabad and New Delhi operations. The frauds involved bill discounting schemes and money laundering. The bank’s violations of its “know your client” and anti-money laundering standards raised concerns about its risk management practices-or lack of such practices. The new chief executive officer was only the second executive from the private sector to head a public sector bank. He needed to prove his value in the world of public sector banking by managing the crisis, implementing a strategy to stabilize the bank’s financial health, and preventing a recurrence of the problems.Sanjay Dhamija is affiliated with International Management Institute-New Delhi.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Applied Mobile Labs: Valuation of a Start-Up

Case Solution & Analysis for Applied Mobile Labs: Valuation of a Start-Up by Jaslene Kaur Bawa, Vinay Goyal, S.K. Mitra.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Applied Mobile Labs: Valuation of a Start-Up
Authors :           Jaslene Kaur Bawa, Vinay Goyal, S.K. Mitra
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N022 / W16497
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    13 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
An angel investor had invested seed capital in a start-up company that aggregated and sold value-added services for mobile telecommunications in India. The company had done well since its inception in 2009, but the revenue growth figures reported for 2014 were concerning. According to the performance report, the start-up had grown 12 per cent in 2014-less than half of the estimated industry revenue growth figure for mobile value-added services. The investor wondered if his investment was profitable despite the negative cash flows and significant lifetime company losses incurred during the first three years of operation. Should the investor stay invested with, or divest from, the start-up? What would the company’s exit value be?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Shriram Transport Finance

Case Solution & Analysis for Shriram Transport Finance by Gennaro Bernile, Anand Shankar, Rahul Rajani.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Shriram Transport Finance
Authors :           Gennaro Bernile, Anand Shankar, Rahul Rajani
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N051 / W16533
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    12 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In December 2012, the stock of Shriram Transport Finance Company (STFC) had just breached the ₹750 mark, signifying an appreciation of close to 80 per cent for the calendar year of 2012. Texas Pacific Group (TPG), the global private equity firm, had invested in STFC at a time when the share price was hovering around ₹100. As was the case with most private equity firms, a successful exit from an investment was of paramount importance for TPG in order to reap handsome returns. In the course of charting the exit path from an investment, private equity firms had to consider several critical issues including exit structure, timeline for exit, and regulatory hurdles. There were three usual choices of exit routes: initial public offering, trade sale, or secondary sale. Each of the exit routes had its own advantages and disadvantages. Was this the right time for TPG to exit STFC? If yes, which option should TPG pursue?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Talbros Automotive Components Limited: Relative Valuation

Case Solution & Analysis for Talbros Automotive Components Limited: Relative Valuation by Umang Gupta, Monika Chopra.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Talbros Automotive Components Limited: Relative Valuation
Authors :           Umang Gupta, Monika Chopra
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N054 / W16542
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    16 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In 2015, an ancillary client of a leading investment bank based in New Delhi, was looking to increase revenues from the two-wheeler and four-wheeler vehicle segments by acquiring customers that were original equipment manufacturers. A financial analyst was assigned the task of evaluating the options and identifying the right target to acquire for the client. The analyst used comparable company analysis and comparable transaction analysis, as well as valuation ratios (enterprise value-to-sales; enterprise value-to-earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization; and price-to-earnings per share) to arrive at Talbros Automotive Components Limited as the best target for the client. For comparable company analysis, the analyst also compiled a list of four publicly traded firms that were similar to Talbros Automotive Components Limited. The analyst needed to arrive at the final valuation range by combining the results of both techniques (i.e., comparable company analysis and comparable transaction analysis), which could be achieved by using a football field analysis.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Revenue Recognition for a Services Contract

Case Solution & Analysis for Revenue Recognition for a Services Contract by Pratibha Wasan, David J. Sharp.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Revenue Recognition for a Services Contract
Authors :           Pratibha Wasan, David J. Sharp
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B15B005 / W15288
Discipline :        Accounting
Case Length :    13 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
On November 25, 2012, the head of Revenue Recognition at ESol Limited (ESol) India was preparing for a meeting with the company’s sales team at the head office in Bangalore. ESol Limited was a large, U.S.-based multinational information technology corporation, which had moved into India in 2000. Since then, its management had insisted on the need for close monitoring of accounting procedures in strict adherence to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Although the sales team had negotiated the Request for Proposal with MoveForward, a large research firm in India handling and processing high volumes of sensitive data, in good faith, the revenue recognition team felt that clauses dealing with penalties, liquidated damages and termination put their company at risk and wished to defer all of the revenue proposed for the contract until these issues were resolved. The friction between the two teams put the entire deal in jeopardy.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Penn West Petroleum Ltd.

Case Solution & Analysis for Penn West Petroleum Ltd. by Martin Persson, Vaughan Radcliffe, Mitchell Stein, Hammad Siddiqui.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Penn West Petroleum Ltd.
Authors :           Martin Persson, Vaughan Radcliffe, Mitchell Stein, Hammad Siddiqui
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B15B007 / W15336
Discipline :        Accounting
Case Length :    17 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (Penn West), a large Canadian oil company, made multiple acquisitions that led to a buildup of goodwill (i.e., the purchase price was higher than the net book value of the acquisitions). When the economic environment worsened, there was concern that this goodwill had been impaired. The concern deepened as economic factors improved but Penn West’s stock performance continued to be poor, indicating that the market believed that the company was potentially overvalued. A review of Penn West’s accounting practices revealed irregularities, and industry analysts – as well as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission – began to question the value of the company’s goodwill. It was becoming clear that Penn West had been overly optimistic in its forecasts regarding revenue streams from its properties. Would the company be able to move forward? How?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Blackberry 10

Case Solution & Analysis for Blackberry 10 by Mary Gillett, Morgan Hart.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Blackberry 10
Authors :           Mary Gillett, Morgan Hart
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B15B008 / W15361
Discipline :        Accounting
Case Length :    10 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
A well-reputed innovative technology company had introduced a new operating system and two new smartphone devices with the goal of turning around the company’s slumping hardware sales. Despite positive product reviews in the media, the models did not sell as well as expected. Consequently, the lower demand led to impairment of inventory and supply commitments at various times throughout the following fiscal year. At the end of the fiscal year, the task facing the company’s chief financial officer was deciding whether or not further impairment was required. Because this decision came at a time of significant uncertainty about the company’s future in the competitive marketplace, the task also involved considering the impact of a potential adjustment on the company’s financial statements and on shareholder confidence.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team