Political

Case Solution for Understanding Political Polls

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Understanding Political Polls
Authors :           Chris A. Higgins
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            907C33
Discipline :        General Management
Case Length :    02 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
This case examines the interpretation of political polls. It discusses margin of error, confidence intervals and the relationship between sample size and margin of error. An Excel spreadsheet is included, Ivey product # 7B07E016, to help students understand the concepts.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Suncor’s Political Role in Fort McMurray

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Suncor’s Political Role in Fort McMurray
Authors :           Michael Valente
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W11103
Discipline :        General Management
Case Length :    14 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In the midst of massive growth in the oil sands, Suncor’s chief executive officer (CEO) is growing concerned about the local government’s inability to cope with unprecedented growth of oils sands development in Fort McMurray, Alberta. Crime, prostitution, drug use, social inequality and ecological deterioration have begun to cripple Fort McMurray and the surrounding area largely because the local government has been unable to support the massive growth with appropriate public services and environmental protection. As part of a major oil and gas company in the region, the CEO is aware of the harsh lessons learned by Shell in Nigeria in 1995, where the company’s reluctance to get involved in political activities led to a massive boycott and tarnished reputation. The CEO is concerned that inaction may hold Suncor complicit in the social and ecological issues in the region. The case illustrates the need for companies to take on political responsibilities, in this case through the active engagement of addressing public service gaps. Written for courses in business and society, stakeholder engagement, public administration, public-private partnerships, strategic management, and negotiations, the case chronicles the motivations of companies such as Suncor to address public service gaps to avoid negative impacts on the firm. Students engage in a role-play representing six different stakeholders, the objective of which is to begin a process of engagement to collectively address the social and ecological issues plaguing the region. The case helps students recognize the growing prevalence of private sector involvement in political affairs and the difference between stakeholder management of and stakeholder engagement with seemingly adversarial stakeholders, the latter of which is critical to collaboratively respond to the complexity of sustainable development.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Rethinking Political Activity at Target

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Rethinking Political Activity at Target
Authors :           Brian K. Richter, Anisha George
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W12350
Discipline :        General Management
Case Length :    14 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
The focus of the case is on understanding firms’ campaign contributions and lobbying strategies – and their limits. The case centers on controversy facing Target Corporation in 2010. In the wake of the Citizens United decision, Target was one of the first companies to take advantage of their newly acquired freedom to use corporate treasury money (rather than money in a corporate-linked PAC) to make a contribution to an independent expenditure committee (aka “Super PAC”). The company decided to make a donation to Minnesota Forward, a political action committee that had the primary goal of supporting job creation within the state. Pro-gay rights activists discovered that Minnesota Forward primarily backed Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer, who had previously supported traditional marriage. After this, Target, despite its liberal and socially responsible positioning, was subject to harsh criticism and activist protests as its donation was viewed as a contradiction to its social policies. The events put CEO Gregg Steinhafel in a position to revisit the company’s policies towards political activities. Should there be constraints on what the firm would do on the political front? If so, what should those be?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub