Board

Case Solution for J&L Railroad: The Board Meeting

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      J&L Railroad: The Board Meeting
Authors :           Kenneth Eades, Rick Green, Jeannine Lehman
Source :             Darden School of Business
Case ID :           UV2566
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    14 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
This short case could be handed out at the end of class discussion on “J&L Railroad” in preparation for the following class, or if students are more experienced with hedging and option pricing, the instructor may choose to cover both cases in a single class period. It is the companion case to “J&L Railroad” and presents more technical issues regarding the hedging problem by requiring students to understand option-pricing principles. The board likes the CFO’s hedging recommendations, but it wants a more careful analysis of the bank’s prices for its risk-management products: the caps and floors. Besides demanding an understanding of option pricing, this case puts particular emphasis on the calculation and use of implied volatility.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Women Board Directors: Championing the Tough Issues
Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Women Board Directors: Championing the Tough Issues
Authors :           Alison Konrad, Nancy Mclnerney-Lacombe
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W13302
Discipline :        Organizational Behavior
Case Length :    11 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In an environment of heightened shareholder activism in Canada, this case investigates the hypothesis that, compared with their male colleagues, women are the more likely champions of tough issues at the board. Interviews with five female directors provide insight into each of their board battles. Through the detailed enactment of their respective stories, the preconditions prompting their championing efforts and the process of how they engaged their fellow directors are presented, providing the opportunity to identify the commonalities and differences between them. Details of the final outcomes are not presented in the case to encourage the students to think through potential finales.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Infosys: Peer Review at Board Level
Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Infosys: Peer Review at Board Level
Authors :           Yaqi Shi, Ramasastry Chandrasekhar
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W14015
Discipline :        Organizational Behavior
Case Length :    12 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Having positioned itself from the beginning as a global enterprise in information technology, Infosys benchmarked its governance practices with the best in the world right from the start, focusing on the importance of performance appraisal at all levels, including that of the board. Indeed, Infosys broke fresh ground when it introduced a model of Peer Review at the board level wherein each board member would annually review the performance of every other individual member of the board. Launched as the personal initiative of the chairman of the board and chief mentor – who also designed its process framework – the Peer Review was meant to raise the stature of corporate governance at Infosys. More than seven years later, Infosys launched Board Review, a more common form of performance appraisal wherein each individual member of the board would annually review the performance of the board as a whole during the previous year. As he re-examined Peer Review in light of this new model of appraisal, the chairman of the board had to decide if Peer Review was serving its purpose, if it was damaging to boardroom collegiality, and how to institutionalize performance appraisal processes before he retired.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Jonathon Elderslie and the Board Decision
Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Jonathon Elderslie and the Board Decision
Authors :           Jeffrey Gandz
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            903M31
Discipline :        General Management
Case Length :    04 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Jonathon Elderslie, recently retired after running his own company for 30 years, must decide what questions he should ask before deciding whether to join the board of directors of a publicly traded company. While flattered by the invitation, he has some concerns given the current climate of concern about corporate governance and, more specifically, the views about the role of a director expressed by one of his business acquaintances.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Enerplus Corporation: Assessing the Board Invitation
Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Enerplus Corporation: Assessing the Board Invitation
Authors :           Malcolm Munro, Michael Maher
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W12199
Discipline :        General Management
Case Length :    11 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Enerplus Corporation was a company transitioning from being a buy-and-sell energy trust to one engaged in exploration and exploitation. The company required two new board members and Sue MacKenzie’s name was proposed to the CEO by the Enerplus vice president of corporate services. While MacKenzie was intrigued with the idea, she had never actively considered board service as a career step and she now had a new career direction at the Banff Centre. She undertook a thorough assessment of this board opportunity with attention to the career benefits, personal benefits, potential risks, impact on her personal life, and “match” with her new career. Following a series of meetings, MacKenzie was invited to serve on the board and she now had to make a decision: should she accept or decline the invitation?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub