Case Analysis

Case Solution for Metro do Porto: An Interest Rate Swap

Case Solution & Analysis for Metro do Porto: An Interest Rate Swap by S. Veena Iyer, Anshul Jain.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Metro do Porto: An Interest Rate Swap
Authors :           S. Veena Iyer, Anshul Jain
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N011 / W16261
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    07 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In January 2007, Metro do Porto, a light rail network, entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Banco Santander Totta on a notional principal of €89 million. The intent was to reduce the interest costs that Metro do Porto was incurring. This was a complex swap agreement that brought immediate benefits to Metro do Porto but proved catastrophic in the long run. Two years after the swap commenced, a “snowball clause” in the swap agreement took effect, increasing Metro do Porto’s liability beyond 60 per cent per annum at a time when market interest rates were low and expected to drop even lower. It was unclear whether the company entered into this agreement out of ignorance, political pressure, or both, but the end result was a lawsuit. Students are expected to analyze the terms of this swap and decide whether the swap constituted good practice from a risk management perspective and whether Metro do Porto should have been able to anticipate the possible losses.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Amtek Auto Ltd.: From Acquisitions to a Financial Crisis

Case Solution & Analysis for Amtek Auto Ltd.: From Acquisitions to a Financial Crisis by Gaurav Singh Chauhan, Gunjan Tomer.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Amtek Auto Ltd.: From Acquisitions to a Financial Crisis
Authors :           Gaurav Singh Chauhan, Gunjan Tomer
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N012 / W16294
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    17 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In the summer of 2015, India-based Amtek Auto Ltd., one of the country’s largest companies in the manufacturing of automotive components, was on the brink of financial ruin. After more than a decade of being immersed in a spending spree on acquisitions to build capacity and expand its clientèle in both the European and Asian auto markets, Amtek’s stock plummeted by 50 per cent within two days as nervous investors worried about the company’s ability to make its scheduled debt payments. Tensions were high as the company faced mounting pressure over its liquidity issues, and after reporting a net loss for the first time in two decades. With rumours of bankruptcy on the horizon, what steps could the company take to decrease its debt burden at a time when the automotive industry was in a slump? Should Amtek consider selling off some of its assets to raise the needed cash, or should it look to banks and investors?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for IndusInd Bank: Residual Income Valuation

Case Solution & Analysis for IndusInd Bank: Residual Income Valuation by Varun Dawar, Rakesh Arrawatia, Saumya Ranjan Dash, Arit Chaudhury.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      IndusInd Bank: Residual Income Valuation
Authors :           Varun Dawar, Rakesh Arrawatia, Saumya Ranjan Dash, Arit Chaudhury
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N015 / W16287
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    07 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In early 2013, an analyst at an insurance company was examining whether IndusInd Bank, a mid-size bank in India, would be a good investment for the insurance fund’s equity portfolio. From January 2008 until March 30, 2013, the bank’s stock had tripled under its new management. The analyst wondered whether deploying funds in the bank would yield any significant returns. He decided to use the available financial information and the residual income valuation method to forecast the company’s stock price.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for GMR Airport Concession: Mumbai Versus Delhi

Case Solution & Analysis for GMR Airport Concession: Mumbai Versus Delhi by Abhilash Nair, Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      GMR Airport Concession: Mumbai Versus Delhi
Authors :           Abhilash Nair, Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N014 / W16306
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    15 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In 2004, bids were invited from airport developers and operators for the development and operation of Mumbai’s Chattrapati Shivaji International Airport and Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport. On January 31, 2006, a consortium led by GMR Group (GMR) was selected as the only technically qualified bidder. However, in order to avoid a monopoly in Indian airport operations, GMR was asked to choose between the two airports and match the financial bid of another bidder that was not technically qualified for the work. The Delhi airport, the pride of the National Capital Region, would serve as a gateway for participants, dignitaries, and other guests arriving for the upcoming Commonwealth Games to be held in New Delhi in October 2010. However, the Mumbai airport was the gateway to business investments in India. GMR faced a difficult choice between a mission-critical airport in the National Capital Region or an airport in India’s commercial capital. Which airport would give GMR an edge in the global aviation sector? Which choice was in line with GMR’s vision?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Toyota’s Innovative Share Issue (2015)

Case Solution & Analysis for Toyota’s Innovative Share Issue (2015) by Emir Hrnjic.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Toyota’s Innovative Share Issue (2015)
Authors :           Emir Hrnjic
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N008 / W16373
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    13 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In June 2015, the Toyota Motor Corporation’s annual shareholders’ meeting included a proposal regarding Toyota’s new share issue. Named “Model AA” shares after the company’s first passenger car, the shares would offer investors new hybrid securities. This proposal created a lot of controversy among existing shareholders. Although President Toyoda claimed that no one would be disadvantaged by these shares, it remained unclear how many shareholders had confidence in this assurance. The share issue, which would potentially comprise up to 5 per cent of Toyota’s total outstanding shares, would require the support of a two-thirds majority of shareholders. The new shares looked like ordinary shares with a “lock-up” period or preferred shares with voting rights. At the same time, Model AA shares resembled a convertible debt issue with voting rights (with a conversion ratio to be determined later). It was time to vote on the approval of Toyota’s new share issue, but the following questions lingered in the shareholders’ minds: What exactly was the difference between Model AA shares and ordinary shares? What was the difference between Model AA shares and bonds (or convertible bonds)? Finally, if the vote was approved, how should Model AA shares be priced?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for The Pipeline Company: Financing for China’s MNGPP

Case Solution & Analysis for The Pipeline Company: Financing for China’s MNGPP by Xiuqin Wang, Ming Jian.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      The Pipeline Company: Financing for China’s MNGPP
Authors :           Xiuqin Wang, Ming Jian
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N019 / W16449
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    09 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In 2008, the Multinational Natural Gas Pipeline Project was sponsored by China National Group Corporation to undertake a major international infrastructure project in Asia. The Pipeline Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of China National Group Corporation, established joint ventures with the host countries and took the lead in financing the project, which was required to be completed by the end of 2009. Initial investments and procurements were made, and payment would soon be due. However, there was a large gap between the estimated total investment and the funds available. Numerous banks expressed interest in the pipeline project, but most required the sponsor to provide a guarantee for the project’s loan. Some banks also asked for an increase in the capital ratio from less than 1 per cent to 20 per cent. The treasurer responsible for the financing of the project was now tasked with the issue of arranging the most effective way to finance the project.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Fraud at Bank of Baroda: Manage Risk or Manage Crisis

Case Solution & Analysis for Fraud at Bank of Baroda: Manage Risk or Manage Crisis by Sanjay Dhamija.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Fraud at Bank of Baroda: Manage Risk or Manage Crisis
Authors :           Sanjay Dhamija
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N021 / W16476
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    09 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Bank of Baroda was the second-largest commercial bank in India, but it was struggling with a decline in profits and an increase in non-performing assets. Only a week before the new chief executive officer’s term commenced, Bank of Baroda was in the news due to reports of fraud occurring at the bank’s Ahmedabad and New Delhi operations. The frauds involved bill discounting schemes and money laundering. The bank’s violations of its “know your client” and anti-money laundering standards raised concerns about its risk management practices-or lack of such practices. The new chief executive officer was only the second executive from the private sector to head a public sector bank. He needed to prove his value in the world of public sector banking by managing the crisis, implementing a strategy to stabilize the bank’s financial health, and preventing a recurrence of the problems.Sanjay Dhamija is affiliated with International Management Institute-New Delhi.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Applied Mobile Labs: Valuation of a Start-Up

Case Solution & Analysis for Applied Mobile Labs: Valuation of a Start-Up by Jaslene Kaur Bawa, Vinay Goyal, S.K. Mitra.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Applied Mobile Labs: Valuation of a Start-Up
Authors :           Jaslene Kaur Bawa, Vinay Goyal, S.K. Mitra
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N022 / W16497
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    13 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
An angel investor had invested seed capital in a start-up company that aggregated and sold value-added services for mobile telecommunications in India. The company had done well since its inception in 2009, but the revenue growth figures reported for 2014 were concerning. According to the performance report, the start-up had grown 12 per cent in 2014-less than half of the estimated industry revenue growth figure for mobile value-added services. The investor wondered if his investment was profitable despite the negative cash flows and significant lifetime company losses incurred during the first three years of operation. Should the investor stay invested with, or divest from, the start-up? What would the company’s exit value be?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Shriram Transport Finance

Case Solution & Analysis for Shriram Transport Finance by Gennaro Bernile, Anand Shankar, Rahul Rajani.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Shriram Transport Finance
Authors :           Gennaro Bernile, Anand Shankar, Rahul Rajani
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N051 / W16533
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    12 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In December 2012, the stock of Shriram Transport Finance Company (STFC) had just breached the ₹750 mark, signifying an appreciation of close to 80 per cent for the calendar year of 2012. Texas Pacific Group (TPG), the global private equity firm, had invested in STFC at a time when the share price was hovering around ₹100. As was the case with most private equity firms, a successful exit from an investment was of paramount importance for TPG in order to reap handsome returns. In the course of charting the exit path from an investment, private equity firms had to consider several critical issues including exit structure, timeline for exit, and regulatory hurdles. There were three usual choices of exit routes: initial public offering, trade sale, or secondary sale. Each of the exit routes had its own advantages and disadvantages. Was this the right time for TPG to exit STFC? If yes, which option should TPG pursue?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Talbros Automotive Components Limited: Relative Valuation

Case Solution & Analysis for Talbros Automotive Components Limited: Relative Valuation by Umang Gupta, Monika Chopra.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Talbros Automotive Components Limited: Relative Valuation
Authors :           Umang Gupta, Monika Chopra
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16N054 / W16542
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    16 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In 2015, an ancillary client of a leading investment bank based in New Delhi, was looking to increase revenues from the two-wheeler and four-wheeler vehicle segments by acquiring customers that were original equipment manufacturers. A financial analyst was assigned the task of evaluating the options and identifying the right target to acquire for the client. The analyst used comparable company analysis and comparable transaction analysis, as well as valuation ratios (enterprise value-to-sales; enterprise value-to-earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization; and price-to-earnings per share) to arrive at Talbros Automotive Components Limited as the best target for the client. For comparable company analysis, the analyst also compiled a list of four publicly traded firms that were similar to Talbros Automotive Components Limited. The analyst needed to arrive at the final valuation range by combining the results of both techniques (i.e., comparable company analysis and comparable transaction analysis), which could be achieved by using a football field analysis.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team