Dilemma

Case Solution for Asclepius Consulting: The Sales Force Dilemma

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Asclepius Consulting: The Sales Force Dilemma
Authors :           Sreeram Sivaramakrishnan
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W13563
Discipline :        Marketing
Case Length :    13 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Asclepius Consulting is one of the many small software companies in India that have aspirations to become product companies as opposed to being services companies. Asclepius Consulting deals in hospital management information systems and has a product and service offering that is competitive and well received by customers. However, due to lack of capital, the company has been unable to invest in a sales force, and this has created a problem of reach. It is currently selling through a combination of resellers (external parties contracted to sell the software) and an inside sales force. Now, one of its three co-founders, whose expertise is in business process restructuring and business planning and strategy, is looking at revisiting the sales and marketing model in this complex marketplace.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Apollo Tyres: Investment Decision Dilemma

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Apollo Tyres: Investment Decision Dilemma
Authors :           Varun Dawar, Rakesh Arrawatia
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W14561
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    12 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In early March 2012, an investor sat at home in Gurgaon, India examining the latest financial information about Apollo Tyres Limited, India’s leading tire manufacturer. Over the past decade, the company had significantly diversified its product and geographic mix through organic investment and strategic acquisitions and had experienced superior growth opportunities. Yet, after almost doubling between 2007 and 2010, its share price had not seen any significant appreciation in the last two years, delivering only 12 per cent return between 2010 and 2012. Would this be a good investment? He decided to use the free cash flow discounting valuation technique to identify and value this high growth but undervalued stock.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Franklin Templeton India: The Cash Holding Dilemma

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Franklin Templeton India: The Cash Holding Dilemma
Authors :           Nupur Pavan Bang, Dhruva Raj Chatterji, Vikram Kuriyan
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W12524
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    17 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Franklin Resources Inc. is one of the largest and most respected global fund houses with a presence in India. The case highlights the structure, investment process and philosophy of its fund management team in India. The case presents the specific issue of fund managers holding large amounts of cash during market downturns. There is one school of thought that attributes lower volatility and better risk-adjusted returns with high cash holdings. The other school of thought believes this approach goes against the philosophy of investment management. It believes people give money to fund managers to invest, not to hold in the form of cash. A fund should always be fully invested or nearly fully invested. The chief investment officer at Franklin Templeton India is of the second school of thought and is faced with the challenge of convincing a team of young analysts and managers of its soundness. He presents a set of data to this team and asks them to analyze performance during periods of market downturns in order to arrive at a conclusion.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for In a Bind: Peak Sealing Technologies’ Product Line Extension Dilemma

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      In a Bind: Peak Sealing Technologies’ Product Line Extension Dilemma
Authors :           Robert J. Dolan, Heather Beckham
Source :             HBS Brief Cases
Case ID :            914533
Discipline :        Marketing
Case Length :    10 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Peak Sealing Technologies (PST), a manufacturer of premium carton sealing tapes, stresses technological innovation as the company’s core value. But when a new regional competitor introduces a less expensive and inferior product, PST is faced with a decision that could conflict with their values. Product manager Emma Taylor must decide if the company should augment its existing high-quality product line with a cheaper, less effective product to compete with their competitor. However, this decision could cannibalize PST’s premium line. Emma is faced with a key issue in product line management–determining the variety of products in the line that serve the same function. Students are introduced to the problems of “trading down” the product line and must consider whether the company’s corporate values are a strength or liability. This case can be used effectively in a first-year MBA course on marketing management to illustrate concepts associated with the risk and strategy of introducing a product line extension. It also allows for more complex analysis that would be appropriate in an Executive MBA program or advanced MBA elective courses in Product Management, Business to Business Marketing, Sales Management or New Product Development.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Litehouse Foods: The Glass Dilemma

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Litehouse Foods: The Glass Dilemma
Authors :           John J. Lawrence, Anubha Mishra, Marie Pengilly
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0288
Discipline :        Marketing
Case Length :    20 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
This case focuses on whether Litehouse Foods should switch its signature creamy salad dressings from glass to plastic packaging. The central figure in the case is Doug Hawkins Jr., the company’s Senior Business Development Manager (Marketing lead). The company, which is one of three major players nationally in the refrigerated salad dressing market, has been selling its dressings in glass jars for 50 years, and these glass jars are considered an important element in how consumers think about the Litehouse brand. Two of Litehouse Foods’ competitors have recently switched to plastic, however, and this has helped them achieve a significant price advantage over Litehouse at retail. Switching to plastic jars would save Litehouse $1.5 million/year and allow it to narrow the price advantage opened up by competitors. Doug must develop a recommendation to the company’s executive committee that considers the cost savings potential of plastic against the value of the glass packaging to the brand. Complicating this decision are the environmental implications of a switch from glass to plastic, both real and perceived, as well as how a change at this time would mesh with the company’s recently launched growth strategy.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for At a Crossroads: The Strategic Dilemma at PENPOL

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      At a Crossroads: The Strategic Dilemma at PENPOL
Authors :           Rajasree K. Rajamma, Catherine Giapponi, Arun Kumar S Rao, Chandrasekhar Padmakumar
Source :             North American Case Research Association (NACRA)
Case ID :            NA0294
Discipline :        General Management
Case Length :    26 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Vasudev Nair, CEO of PENPOL, a medical devices company in India, was facing a financial crisis. With debt mounting and cash flow becoming increasingly problematic, he had to make some decisions about the future of the company. Incorporated in 1987 under Nair’s leadership, PENPOL began as a producer of hematology products with the introduction of its innovative blood bag product. The blood bag business was expanded with the introduction of multiple types of bags and blood bag equipment. In 1993 the company entered the urology business with the introduction of urine bags and within four years the urology line was expanded to include stone management devices, leg bags and foley catheters. Growth in the urology business was met with limited success however, and by 1998 PENPOL had exited all but the urine bag product line. The failed launches resulted in huge inventories of unsold goods and problems getting payment from stockists (distributors) that contributed to the company’s mounting debt and cash problems. In addition, the Urology Division’s flagship product, the urine bag, faced intensified price competition. PENPOL’s Blood Bag Division was also suffering due to increased competition in the Indian market. Vasudev Nair had to stop the bleeding. He considered a few alternatives. Knowing that the company had no more access to debt financing, he considered the possibility of securing private equity or the infusion of funds from some of the co-owners of PENPOL. With this infusion of funds, could he or should he save both the Blood Bag and Urology Divisions? Should he divest or sell the Urology Division in order to bring in funds to shore up the blood bag business? Divesting the Urology Division would mean sacrificing the star product, the urine bag, which after much effort was gaining acceptance in the market. Given that a competitor had expressed interest in the company, he considered establishing a joint venture with the competitor.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Dilemma at Devil’s Den

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Dilemma at Devil’s Den
Authors :           Kim Johnson, Allan Cohen
Source:              Babson College
Case ID:             BAB081
Discipline :        Social Enterprise
Case Length :    03 pages
Solution sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
This case deals primarily with ethics and the individual’s personal system and the way it affects his or her perceptions and actions. It also looks at rewards and punishments and their influence on behavior. Susan is a student employee at a campus snack bar who is caught between a wish to do what she thinks is right–take steps to stop food being taken off the premises that hasn’t been paid for–and fear of negative consequences if she takes such action. She would also like to see students work harder, finish what is assigned to them on the night shift, and be punished for stealing from the cash register. Almost all students have faced peer pressure to do things that violate their value systems. The case helps students to understand why they feel so much ambivalence, sometimes going along and sometimes setting limits. Some issues are ethical; others involve criminal behavior. Issues include sexual permissiveness and experimentation, drug use and dealing, cheating, trespassing, and stealing. The case also raises questions of a company’s ethics and responsibility for creating, or allowing, a climate that tolerates at best, and encourages at worst, illegal, criminal, or unethical behavior.

Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub