Schultz

Case Solution for Gillette’s Energy Drain (B): Energizer’s Acquisition of Schick

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Gillette’s Energy Drain (B): Energizer’s Acquisition of Schick
Authors :           Frank C. Schultz, Michael T. McCune
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            905M27
Discipline :        Strategy
Case Length :    14 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Supplements the (A) case.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Gillette’s Energy Drain (A): The Acquisition of Duracell

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Gillette’s Energy Drain (A): The Acquisition of Duracell
Authors :           Frank C. Schultz, Michael T. McCune
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            905M26
Discipline :        Strategy
Case Length :    18 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In 1996, Gillette acquired Duracell for $7.3 billion in stock. The purchase was met with optimism not only by Gillette’s senior management and its highly visible director, Warren Buffet, but also Wall Street analysts. Highlights the numerous challenges that Gillette has encountered since the acquisition. Despite the initial enthusiasm, Duracell has proven to be a drain on Gillette’s earnings and has cost Michael Hawley, James Kilt’s predecessor as CEO, his job after only 18 months in the position–in large part for his inability to turn around the financial hemorrhaging at the Duracell division. The key strategy questions revolve around what can be done to turn around the battery business to help it achieve the potential for Gillette that everyone had assumed it possessed.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Let’s Take This Private: Linens ‘n Things Versus Bed Bath & Beyond

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Let’s Take This Private: Linens ‘n Things Versus Bed Bath & Beyond
Authors :           Frank C. Schultz, Tina Doede, Elizabeth Nicknam-Retana
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            909M61
Discipline :        General Management
Case Length :    12 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
The case focuses on the housewares subgroup within the overall retail sector. During the period considered by the case (1970s to 2006), housewares in North America saw the emergence of two “big-box” retailers – Linens ‘n Things (LNT) and Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY). LNT and BBBY were founded within four years of each other and their corporate headquarters were just 16 miles apart. Despite this remarkable similarity in starting conditions, their performance outcomes diverged sharply. On the surface, both companies were pursuing a similar business-level strategy of cost leadership, but key strategic decisions led them down quite different evolutionary paths. Both companies focused on providing consumers with high-quality houseware goods in a no-frills, value-priced environment, but LNT’s decision to build centralized warehouses – seemingly consistent with a cost leadership strategy – ended up bringing it into direct competition with Target and Walmart. In contrast, BBBY allowed for greater decentralization in decision making, thereby allowing more store-level decision making and greater customization to local consumers’ tastes. As a result, BBBY was able to better differentiate itself from Walmart and Target. The case allows instructors to introduce basic strategy concepts, such as industry and environmental analysis, business-level strategies, core competencies and administrative heritage. At the time of the case (February 2006), BBBY’s market capitalization was approximately $10.7 billion, while LNT had just been acquired for $1.3 billion by a private equity firm. The case begins right after the acquisition and takes the perspective of the new CEO of LNT, who is tasked with devising a turnaround plan.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub