Largest

Innovating at Arauco: Chile’s Largest Forestry Company Case Solution

Case Solution & Analysis for Innovating at Arauco: Chile’s Largest Forestry Company by Carlos Osorio, Pratima Bansal.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Innovating at Arauco: Chile’s Largest Forestry Company
Authors :           Carlos Osorio, Pratima Bansal
Source :              Ivey Publishing
Case ID :           9B16M139 / W16548
Discipline :        General Management
Case Length :    08 pages
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
On February 27, 2010, Chile was razed by a three-minute earthquake of 8.8 magnitude on the Richter scale. More than 500 people died and nearly 400,000 homes were destroyed. The overall cost was estimated at US$20 billion. Over 70 per cent of the people who had died in the earthquake were from the coastal town of Constitución. Celulosa Arauco y Constitución (Arauco), a Chilean-based forestry and timber company, was Constitución’s largest employer. Arauco’s pulp mill and major sawmill in Constitución was completely destroyed, and all but one of the 34 remaining manufacturing facilities were wiped out. The company’s executives moved rapidly to respond to the crisis and create a plan to rebuild Constitución. By the end of April 2010, Arauco’s pulp business in Chile was operating at 70 per cent capacity and in May, the company’s pulp mill in Constitución reopened. However, the disaster had left an indelible imprint on Arauco’s vision and values. The company had been thinking about pursuing further innovation. The company’s values of efficiency and productivity had been tested with an environmental disaster in 2005, but innovation was still limited. Then in 2009, an opportunity provided Arauco with the ability to engage innovation on a larger scale. But the earthquake and rebuilding efforts now required the company’s full attention. Should Arauco proceed with its innovation, and if so how would Arauco balance these two different objectives?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub Team

Case Solution for Richter: Information Technology at Hungary’s Largest Pharma

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Richter: Information Technology at Hungary’s Largest Pharma
Authors :           Deborah Compeau, Jordan Mitchell, Gyorgy Drotos, Emma Incze, Gyorgy Vas
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            907E21
Discipline :        Operations Management
Case Length :    23 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
The director of information technology (IT) at Ritcher, a major Hungarian pharmaceutical company with operations throughout Eastern Europe, is in the midst of planning for the IT department for the coming years. The three main considerations for the coming year are: Is the current IT structure appropriate to meet the growing demands of the overall organization? To what extent should IT affiliates be centrally controlled? How can IT best serve the rest of the company?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for BCE Inc.: World’s Largest LBO Deal in Jeopardy

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      BCE Inc.: World’s Largest LBO Deal in Jeopardy
Authors :           Stephen R. Foerster
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            909N29
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    04 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In November, 2008, BCI Inc. (BCE) appeared to be on track to meet a December 2008 deadline to complete a $52-billion privatization deal. A consortium had previously submitted a winning leveraged buyout (LBO) bid that was estimated to add an estimated $32 billion in debt to the company. Mere days before the deal’s “termination date,” BCE executives were stunned to hear that KPMG auditors advised the deal was in jeopardy of collapse – based on a clause that normally merited little attention. The auditors noted that, on the basis of preliminary assessment, the company had not passed a required “solvency test” which compared the estimated value of BCE’s assets and liabilities in the event that BCE needed to liquidate. BCE executives had little time to determine if the deal could still be saved and if so, how? Conversely, if the deal could not be completed, what would the organization’s next steps be?
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub