V. 2.5

Case Solution for Battle for Value: Federal Express Corp. vs. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (Abridged) (v. 2.5)

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Battle for Value: Federal Express Corp. vs. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (Abridged) (v. 2.5)
Authors :           Robert F. Bruner, Derick Bulkley
Source :             Darden School of Business
Case ID :           UV0004
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    24 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In July 1995, J.C. Penney announced the award to United Parcel Service (UPS) of a billion-dollar, five-year contract for delivery services. This was the largest distribution contract ever awarded and represented a dramatic concentration of Penney’s business with one carrier. Invites students to assess the financial performance of Federal Express and UPS. The two firms have competed intensely for dominance of the overnight express package industry. Requires no numerical computations of the students; rather, their tasks include interpretation of the results and reflection on the result’s implications.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Structuring Repsol’s Acquisition Of Ypf S.A. (A) V. 2.5

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Structuring Repsol’s Acquisition Of Ypf S.A. (A) V. 2.5
Authors :           Robert F. Bruner, Pablo Ciano, Fernanda Pasquarelli
Source :             Darden School of Business
Case ID :           UV2479
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    30 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In April 1999, the CEO of Repsol S.A., the large Spanish oil company, seeks to design the terms of an unsolicited tender offer to the shareholders of Argentina’s largest oil company, YPF. The value to be paid per YPF share has been set. Remaining to be decided are: (a) form of payment, and (b) form of financing, if it is to be a cash deal. The task for the student is to sort through the advantages and disadvantages of three financing alternatives, using a framework such as FRICTO, and to make a recommendation. The objectives of this case are to: (1) illustrate the linkage between acquisition price, form of payment, and acquisition financing; (2) exercise analytical frameworks for comparing financing alternatives; (3) consider the important role of synergy expectations in designing financing.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub