Battle

Case Solution for The Battle For Value: Federal Express Corporation Vs. United Parcel Service Of America, Inc.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      The Battle For Value: Federal Express Corporation Vs. United Parcel Service Of America, Inc.
Authors :           Robert F. Bruner, Derick Bulkley
Source :             Darden School of Business
Case ID :           UV2384
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    33 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Set in July 1995, this case invites students to assess the financial performance of Federal Express and United Parcel Service, two close competitors in the U.S. overnight express package-delivery industry. Although the case requires no numerical computations, it does ask students to interpret results and reflect on the implications. The contrasting financial records of the two firms afford a platform for exploring several important issues, including (1) the definition and use of “economic value added” (EVA) as a measure of corporate performance; (2) a comparison of EVA with other classic approaches of historical performance analysis; (3) the exercise of skills in business-segment analysis; (4) the exploration of the financial implications of intense competition and corporate transformation; and (5) the definition of “excellence” from a corporate-finance point of view.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Battle for Value: Federal Express Corp. vs. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (Abridged) (v. 2.5)

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      Battle for Value: Federal Express Corp. vs. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (Abridged) (v. 2.5)
Authors :           Robert F. Bruner, Derick Bulkley
Source :             Darden School of Business
Case ID :           UV0004
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    24 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
In July 1995, J.C. Penney announced the award to United Parcel Service (UPS) of a billion-dollar, five-year contract for delivery services. This was the largest distribution contract ever awarded and represented a dramatic concentration of Penney’s business with one carrier. Invites students to assess the financial performance of Federal Express and UPS. The two firms have competed intensely for dominance of the overnight express package industry. Requires no numerical computations of the students; rather, their tasks include interpretation of the results and reflection on the result’s implications.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for “War of the Handbags”: The Takeover Battle for Gucci Group N.V.

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      “War of the Handbags”: The Takeover Battle for Gucci Group N.V.
Authors :           Robert F. Bruner, Laurie Simon Hodrick, Sean Carr
Source :             Darden School of Business
Case ID :           UV1364
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    53 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
At three o’clock in the morning on September 10, 2001, Thierry Hautillac, a risk arbitrageur, learns of the final agreement between Pinault-Printemps-Redoute SA (“PPR”) and LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA (“LVMH”). After a contest for control of Gucci lasting over two years, PPR has emerged as the winner. PPR and LVMH have agreed for PPR to buy about half of LVMH’s stock in Gucci for $94 per share, for Gucci to pay an extraordinary dividend of $7 per share, and for PPR to give a two and a half year put option with a strike price of $101.50 to the public shareholders in Gucci. The primary task for the student in this case is to recommend a course of action for Hautillac: should he sell his 2% holding of Gucci shares when the market opens, continue to hold his shares, or buy more shares? The student must estimate the risky arbitrage returns from each of these choices. As a basis for this decision, the student must value the terms of payment and consider what the Gucci stock price will do upon the market’s open. The student must determine the intrinsic value of Gucci using a DCF model as well as information on peer firms and transactions. The student must consider potential synergies between Gucci and PPR and between Gucci and LVMH. The student must assess the likelihood of a higher bid, using analysis of price changes at earlier events in the contest for clues.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for This Bud’s for Who? The Battle for Anheuser-Busch

Complete Case details are given below :

Case Name :      This Bud’s for Who? The Battle for Anheuser-Busch
Authors :           Yiorgos Allayannis, Gerry Yemen, Mary English, Paul Voorhees
Source :             Darden School of Business
Case ID :           UV6934
Discipline :        Finance
Case Length :    13 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
The Anheuser-Busch InBev case represents a major cross-border M&A transaction. Because the material covers a large, well-known transaction involving food and beverage companies, students can focus on both the strategic rationale behind the transaction as well as understand the various valuation issues associated with any M&A deal-including some specific to cross-border M&A, such as currency conversion of foreign sales. The material includes both student and instructor spreadsheets.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Battle in the Shipyard

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Battle in the Shipyard
Authors :           Subhash Jha, Viswanathan Nagarajan, Sudhakar Reddy
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            W14523
Discipline :        Entrepreneurship
Case Length :    15 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Great Offshore Limited (GOL), a leading player in the Indian offshore oilfield services industry, was one of the largest customers of Bharati Shipyard Limited (BSL), the second-largest private-sector shipbuilding company in India. BSL had acquired an approximately 15 per cent stake in GOL (by invoking a share pledge) and made a public offer for a further 20 per cent stake in GOL. BSL’s rival – ABG Shipyard Limited (ABG) – announced a counter-offer. By early August 2009, both BSL and ABG had made further counter-offers and the latest offer price by ABG was 51 per cent higher than the first offer made by BSL. Both players had also invested substantially in building up their equity holdings in GOL. BSL had to decide on how far it should go to make the acquisition.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub

Case Solution for Battle in the Air (A): Intrinsic and China’s Wireless Internet Industry

Complete Case details are given below :
Case Name :      Battle in the Air (A): Intrinsic and China’s Wireless Internet Industry
Authors :           Wei Lu, Shen Zhang, Wu Wanlin
Source :             Ivey Publishing
Case ID :            901M60
Discipline :        Strategy
Case Length :    22 pages
Solution Sample availability : YES
Plagiarism : NO (100% Original work)
Description for case is given below :
Intrinsic Technology Ltd. is a Shanghai-based wireless Internet software provider. China has a large number of mobile phone users and the market is growing. Various domestic and overseas companies are competing to capture a part of this market. Intrinsic recognized the opportunity to tap into the mobile phone market and was one of the first to offer these users wireless Internet technology. The founder of the company must decide what the next step should be in this emerging market based in a developing country and in light of increasing competition.
 
Click Here to place your order
 
OR
Place your order at casesolutionshub (AT)gmail(dot)com if you want to solve above case.
 
Cordially,
Case Solutions Hub